Answers to a Constituent's Questions re taxes, federal spending, etc.



Q & A:

 1) How would you change taxes and why? 
A: See Playing Robin Hood Politics



2) What do you believe needs to change in federal spending policies and what specific actions would you support? 
A: We will need to re-prioritize defense spending away from bases and hardware to more attention to cyber and space warfare. See We are in an Undeclared War, Whether We Like it or Not. Regarding our "safety net" programs, we need to tighten the eligibility requirements for Social Security Disability, as many people with multiple ABILITIES are eligible because of a single designated disability. For example, a bad back does not prevent a person from using their head in a knowledge industry.



3) What steps would you take to strengthen the US economy?
A: Following the doctors' motto, "First do no harm." Instability and uncertainty cause people to delay spending and businesses from investing, which slows the economy. So, try not to have any big potential changes hanging over the economy for months or years. Don't lie. Work collaboratively, listen to advice from subject matter experts (although not necessarily following all of it), etc. to build trust. Trade the elimination of the Lottery immigration program for an equal number increase in the skilled immigrant program to encourage job creation.



4) Please name two or three people in politics who have done something you admire and why.
A: I am a conservative but consider myself "center-right". So, people like Senator Mitt Romney, deceased Senator John McCain, former Wisconsin U.S. Representative and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, former Michigan Governor Rick Snyder, former Ohio Governor John Kasich and former South Carolina Governor and Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley are the ones I gravitate towards. I like their thoughtful approaches to public policy, disregard for crazy conspiracy theories, and willing to listen to others to try to find better solutions. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Congressional Candidate Rick Olson (MN2) Breaks Party Ranks

Statement on Impeachment Vote in the U.S. House of Representatives Rick Olson, Republican Candidate for Congress, MN District 2 For more info: 320-248-9933, olson48176@gmail.com,  http://rickolsonforcongress.com Sunday, December 15, 2019 – For immediate Release This morning a Star Tribune reporter informed me that Angie Craig had decided to vote “yes” next week on the motion in the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach President Trump, and asked me if I were in her shoes, how would I vote. When I took office as a State Representative in Michigan in 2011, I swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. That oath is still binding today. I understand the Founding Fathers viewed the impeachment process as very similar to the process in a criminal court. The prosecution presents evidence in a preliminary hearing. If the judge hears sufficient evidence to believe a crime has been committed, taking the evidence as true on its face in the absence of any defense from...
Read more

Our Changing Climate: Options to Consider

Image
Our Changing Climate: Options to Consider ·          Have you noticed that the past few “normal” Minnesota winters have not been as cold as 20 or 30 years ago? According to University of Minnesota scientists testifying to the Minnesota House of Representatives earlier this year, between 1895 and 2015, average daily low temperatures in winter have increased. In the northern part of the state, they’re up 4.8 degrees over that period and 3.4 degrees in the south. One study pointed out that between 1959 and 1978 Duluth averaged 45 days a year in which the average daily temperature did not top 10 degrees Fahrenheit. Between 1999 and 2018, there were no such days. ·          Have you noticed that the emerald ash borer territory has moved north with the borers not killed in the winter as the winters have gotten warmer, such that our state’s ash trees have been disappearing? ·    ...
Read more

Skeptical about Climate Science? It is smart to be skeptical.

Image
The paper below establishes (1) who accepts the scientific evidence that climate change is real, primarily caused by humans burning fossil fuels and that it is urgent that we do something about it and (2) who does not. If after reading this, and you are still skeptical, I would love to hear from you about how you evaluate sources of information, i.e., how you determine who you should believe and who not - not only on this issue but on other issues. "Skeptical about Climate Science?   It is smart to be skeptical. By Alan Anderson, Northfield. But please consider: The scientists and leadership of these organizations . . . agree that human-caused climate change is happening, mainly due to greenhouse gas emissions, and that the consequences of not significantly reducing CO 2 emissions are negative, irreversible and   will imperil all future generations. 1.        The American Petroleum Institute : “Few things threaten America...
Read more