Very Good Article About Saving Social Security

Their prescription:

"To address these issues, policymakers should enact a 2016 package developed by a Bipartisan Policy Center commission (of which I was a member). The plan would raise the payroll tax cap substantially, raise the payroll tax rate by 1% over 10 years for both employees and employers, and increase the income taxation of Social Security benefits for high-income households. It would change the way Social Security calculates inflation to better reflect price changes. To encourage people to work longer, the full retirement age would rise by one month every two years starting in 2022 until it reaches 69 in 2070."

"Social Security is drying up. This plan could save it,"
By William G. Gale for CNN Business Perspectives

Updated 9:23 AM ET, Sat April 27, 2019


 You can come up with your own plan on the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget website 
http://www.crfb.org/socialsecurityreformer/ . Play with the factors below and you will be amazed how easily you could solve the funding problem, and how easily Congress could do so, if they only had the political will.

  • Adjusting the retirement age.
  • Adjusting the taxability of the SS benefits for higher income recipients.
  • Changing the inflation factor to better reflect the basket of goods seniors purchase.
  • Raising the payroll tax cap ($132,900 in 2019).
  • Raising the SS tax rate.
Very small tweaks in each of the factors, so no one is hurt very much, can solve the problem. 

But, what all this misses is the opportunity to expand the number of people paying the tax that could be realized by increasing the number of highly qualified immigrants (or even more guest workers for laborers) allowed into the USA. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Congressional Candidate Rick Olson (MN2) Breaks Party Ranks

Statement on Impeachment Vote in the U.S. House of Representatives Rick Olson, Republican Candidate for Congress, MN District 2 For more info: 320-248-9933, olson48176@gmail.com,  http://rickolsonforcongress.com Sunday, December 15, 2019 – For immediate Release This morning a Star Tribune reporter informed me that Angie Craig had decided to vote “yes” next week on the motion in the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach President Trump, and asked me if I were in her shoes, how would I vote. When I took office as a State Representative in Michigan in 2011, I swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. That oath is still binding today. I understand the Founding Fathers viewed the impeachment process as very similar to the process in a criminal court. The prosecution presents evidence in a preliminary hearing. If the judge hears sufficient evidence to believe a crime has been committed, taking the evidence as true on its face in the absence of any defense from...
Read more

Our Changing Climate: Options to Consider

Image
Our Changing Climate: Options to Consider ·          Have you noticed that the past few “normal” Minnesota winters have not been as cold as 20 or 30 years ago? According to University of Minnesota scientists testifying to the Minnesota House of Representatives earlier this year, between 1895 and 2015, average daily low temperatures in winter have increased. In the northern part of the state, they’re up 4.8 degrees over that period and 3.4 degrees in the south. One study pointed out that between 1959 and 1978 Duluth averaged 45 days a year in which the average daily temperature did not top 10 degrees Fahrenheit. Between 1999 and 2018, there were no such days. ·          Have you noticed that the emerald ash borer territory has moved north with the borers not killed in the winter as the winters have gotten warmer, such that our state’s ash trees have been disappearing? ·    ...
Read more

Skeptical about Climate Science? It is smart to be skeptical.

Image
The paper below establishes (1) who accepts the scientific evidence that climate change is real, primarily caused by humans burning fossil fuels and that it is urgent that we do something about it and (2) who does not. If after reading this, and you are still skeptical, I would love to hear from you about how you evaluate sources of information, i.e., how you determine who you should believe and who not - not only on this issue but on other issues. "Skeptical about Climate Science?   It is smart to be skeptical. By Alan Anderson, Northfield. But please consider: The scientists and leadership of these organizations . . . agree that human-caused climate change is happening, mainly due to greenhouse gas emissions, and that the consequences of not significantly reducing CO 2 emissions are negative, irreversible and   will imperil all future generations. 1.        The American Petroleum Institute : “Few things threaten America...
Read more